<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answering USMLE Type Questions &#8211; Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.askdoc-usmle.com/answering-usmle-type-questions-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.askdoc-usmle.com/answering-usmle-type-questions-part-ii/</link>
	<description>All about USMLE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.askdoc-usmle.com/answering-usmle-type-questions-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>amer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.askdoc-usmle.com/?p=155#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

I really like your work, I am wondering do you think it is true to assume that pattern recognition is a quick lite differential diagnosis?
I was also wondering do you think that pattern recognition is sufficient for step 2 and 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>I really like your work, I am wondering do you think it is true to assume that pattern recognition is a quick lite differential diagnosis?<br />
I was also wondering do you think that pattern recognition is sufficient for step 2 and 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.askdoc-usmle.com/answering-usmle-type-questions-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>kamran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.askdoc-usmle.com/?p=155#comment-400</guid>
		<description>once again great analysis of the enemy 
and as u said in your e-book that know your enemy
it&#039;s only u on the whole net (as far as my links) who descibes this enemy so greatly that has no match and also how to deal with it..
keep up the good work ,it really helps..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once again great analysis of the enemy<br />
and as u said in your e-book that know your enemy<br />
it&#8217;s only u on the whole net (as far as my links) who descibes this enemy so greatly that has no match and also how to deal with it..<br />
keep up the good work ,it really helps..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

